Introduction to Quantum Physics

A rigorous self-contained note covering the historical motivation, the mathematical framework, and the canonical exactly-solvable models of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Every derivation is shown step by step.

Quantum Mechanics Schrödinger Equation Wave Function Uncertainty Principle Operators Exactly Solvable Models Tunnelling

1. Crisis of Classical Physics historical motivation

Towards the end of the 19th century, classical physics seemed complete. Two phenomena shattered that confidence: the spectrum of radiation emitted by a hot object (blackbody radiation) and the photoelectric effect.

Blackbody radiation

A blackbody is an idealised object that absorbs all incident radiation and re-emits it purely as a function of its temperature \(T\). Experimentally, the energy density \(u(\nu, T)\) (energy per unit volume per unit frequency) is a smooth curve peaked at a frequency proportional to \(T\) (Wien's displacement law).

The Rayleigh–Jeans law and the ultraviolet catastrophe

Classical statistical mechanics treats each mode of the electromagnetic field as a harmonic oscillator. The equipartition theorem assigns average energy \(k_BT\) to each mode (kinetic + potential). The number of modes per unit volume in the frequency interval \([\nu, \nu+d\nu]\) is \(g(\nu) = 8\pi\nu^2/c^3\), giving:

Rayleigh–Jeans law
\[ u_\text{RJ}(\nu, T) = g(\nu)\cdot k_B T = \frac{8\pi\nu^2}{c^3}\,k_B T. \]

This agrees with experiment at low frequencies but diverges as \(\nu\to\infty\). Integrating over all \(\nu\) gives infinite total energy — the ultraviolet catastrophe.

Planck's quantum hypothesis (1900)

Max Planck proposed that each oscillator of frequency \(\nu\) can only hold energy in discrete multiples of a minimum quantum:

Planck quantisation
\[ E_n = n h \nu, \qquad n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots \] where \(h = 6.626\times10^{-34}\ \text{J·s}\) is Planck's constant.
Derivation of the Planck distribution

Using the Boltzmann factor, the probability of the oscillator being in state \(n\) is \(P_n = e^{-nh\nu/k_BT}/Z\), with partition function

\[ Z = \sum_{n=0}^\infty e^{-nh\nu/k_BT} = \frac{1}{1 - e^{-h\nu/k_BT}}. \]

The average energy is then:

\[ \langle E \rangle = -\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial \beta} \quad \bigl(\beta = 1/k_BT\bigr) = \frac{h\nu}{e^{h\nu/k_BT} - 1}. \]

Multiplying by the mode density:

\[ \boxed{u(\nu, T) = \frac{8\pi h\nu^3}{c^3}\cdot\frac{1}{e^{h\nu/k_BT}-1}.} \]
Low-frequency limit (\(h\nu \ll k_BT\)). \(e^{h\nu/k_BT}-1 \approx h\nu/k_BT\), so \(u \approx (8\pi\nu^2/c^3)k_BT\) — recovers Rayleigh–Jeans. ✓
High-frequency limit (\(h\nu \gg k_BT\)). \(e^{h\nu/k_BT}\gg 1\), so \(u \approx (8\pi h\nu^3/c^3)e^{-h\nu/k_BT}\to 0\) — the catastrophe is cured because quantum discreteness suppresses high-energy modes. ✓
Key conceptual shift. Energy is not a continuous variable. An oscillator cannot absorb an arbitrary amount of energy from the field; it can only receive whole quanta \(h\nu\). At high frequency, \(h\nu \gg k_BT\), so thermal fluctuations cannot even excite the first level.

2. Photons and the Photoelectric Effect Einstein 1905

Shining light on a metal surface ejects electrons. Classical wave theory predicts: (i) any frequency should eventually eject electrons if the intensity is high enough, (ii) the kinetic energy of emitted electrons should grow with intensity. Both predictions are wrong.

Experimental facts

Einstein's photon hypothesis

Einstein proposed that light consists of discrete quanta (photons), each carrying energy \(E = h\nu\). When a photon is absorbed by the metal, it gives all its energy to a single electron. Part of that energy is used to overcome the binding energy \(\phi\) (the work function), and the rest becomes kinetic energy:

Photoelectric equation
\[ K_\text{max} = h\nu - \phi. \]
Stopping potential derivation

To measure \(K_\text{max}\), apply a retarding voltage \(V_s\) (stopping potential) until the most energetic electrons are just stopped:

\[ eV_s = K_\text{max} = h\nu - \phi. \] Rearranging: \[ V_s = \frac{h}{e}\,\nu - \frac{\phi}{e}. \]

This is a linear relation between \(V_s\) and \(\nu\). The slope \(h/e\) is universal (same for all metals) and gives a direct measurement of \(h\). The intercept \(-\phi/e\) depends on the metal.

Photon momentum. Combining \(E=h\nu\) with the relativistic relation \(E=pc\) for massless particles: \[ p = \frac{E}{c} = \frac{h\nu}{c} = \frac{h}{\lambda}. \] This is the photon momentum — it will reappear in Compton scattering and de Broglie's hypothesis.

3. Compton Scattering photon momentum confirmed

Arthur Compton (1923) scattered X-rays off free electrons and found that the scattered X-rays had a longer wavelength than the incident ones. Classical wave theory predicts no change in wavelength. The photon picture explains it perfectly via an elastic collision.

Setup

Let the incident photon have wavelength \(\lambda\) and travel along the \(x\)-axis. After scattering, the photon leaves at angle \(\theta\) with wavelength \(\lambda'\), and the electron recoils at angle \(\phi\).

Full derivation of the Compton formula

Photon four-momenta.

\[ E_\gamma = \frac{hc}{\lambda}, \quad p_\gamma = \frac{h}{\lambda}; \qquad E_{\gamma'} = \frac{hc}{\lambda'}, \quad p_{\gamma'} = \frac{h}{\lambda'}. \]

Conservation of energy (electron initially at rest, so \(E_e = m_e c^2\)):

\[ \frac{hc}{\lambda} + m_e c^2 = \frac{hc}{\lambda'} + E_e'. \tag{1} \]

Conservation of momentum (\(x\)- and \(y\)-components):

\[ \frac{h}{\lambda} = \frac{h}{\lambda'}\cos\theta + p_e'\cos\phi, \tag{2} \] \[ 0 = \frac{h}{\lambda'}\sin\theta - p_e'\sin\phi. \tag{3} \]

Eliminate the electron. From (2) and (3):

\[ p_e'\cos\phi = \frac{h}{\lambda} - \frac{h}{\lambda'}\cos\theta, \qquad p_e'\sin\phi = \frac{h}{\lambda'}\sin\theta. \] Squaring and adding: \[ (p_e'c)^2 = \left(\frac{hc}{\lambda}\right)^2 - 2\frac{h^2c^2}{\lambda\lambda'}\cos\theta + \left(\frac{hc}{\lambda'}\right)^2. \tag{4} \]

From (1): \(E_e' = hc/\lambda - hc/\lambda' + m_ec^2\). Using \((E_e')^2 = (p_e'c)^2 + (m_ec^2)^2\):

\[ (p_e'c)^2 = (E_e')^2 - (m_ec^2)^2 = \left(\frac{hc}{\lambda} - \frac{hc}{\lambda'} + m_ec^2\right)^2 - (m_ec^2)^2. \tag{5} \]

Expanding (5) and equating with (4) (the \((hc/\lambda)^2\) and \((hc/\lambda')^2\) terms cancel):

\[ -2\frac{h^2c^2}{\lambda\lambda'}\cos\theta = -2\frac{h^2c^2}{\lambda\lambda'} + 2m_ec^2\left(\frac{hc}{\lambda} - \frac{hc}{\lambda'}\right). \] Dividing by \(2hc\): \[ -\frac{h}{\lambda\lambda'}\cos\theta = -\frac{h}{\lambda\lambda'} + m_ec\!\left(\frac{1}{\lambda} - \frac{1}{\lambda'}\right). \] Rearranging: \[ \boxed{\Delta\lambda = \lambda' - \lambda = \frac{h}{m_ec}(1-\cos\theta) = \lambda_C(1-\cos\theta).} \]
Compton wavelength
\[ \lambda_C = \frac{h}{m_e c} = \frac{6.626\times10^{-34}}{(9.109\times10^{-31})(2.998\times10^8)} \approx 2.426 \times 10^{-12}\ \text{m} = 2.426\ \text{pm}. \]

The maximum shift is at \(\theta=180°\): \(\Delta\lambda_\text{max} = 2\lambda_C \approx 4.85\ \text{pm}\).

4. Wave–Particle Duality de Broglie 1924

If light (classically a wave) behaves like a particle, perhaps particles (classically point masses) behave like waves. Louis de Broglie proposed this symmetry in his 1924 PhD thesis.

de Broglie relations

By analogy with the photon (\(E=h\nu\) and \(p=h/\lambda\)), de Broglie proposed for any particle:

de Broglie relations
\[ \lambda = \frac{h}{p}, \qquad \nu = \frac{E}{h}, \qquad \text{or equivalently:} \quad \mathbf{p} = \hbar\mathbf{k}, \quad E = \hbar\omega, \] where \(\hbar = h/(2\pi)\), \(k = 2\pi/\lambda\) is the wave number, and \(\omega = 2\pi\nu\).

Double-slit experiment

Davisson and Germer (1927) fired electrons at a crystal and observed diffraction patterns — direct evidence that electrons have a wavelength. The same experiment has since been done with neutrons, atoms, and even large molecules (C\(_{60}\) buckyballs).

The mystery. Even when electrons are sent through the slits one at a time, an interference pattern builds up over many detections. Each individual electron lands at one definite spot, yet the statistical distribution shows wave-like interference. The electron interferes with itself.

Phase velocity vs group velocity

A free particle is associated with a wave packet: a superposition of plane waves centred around wave number \(k_0\). Two velocities matter:

Two velocities of a wave packet
\[ v_\text{phase} = \frac{\omega}{k} = \frac{E}{\hbar} \cdot \frac{\hbar}{p} = \frac{E}{p} = \frac{p^2/2m}{p} = \frac{p}{2m} = \frac{v_\text{particle}}{2}, \] \[ v_\text{group} = \frac{d\omega}{dk}\bigg|_{k_0} = \frac{dE/\hbar}{dp/\hbar} = \frac{dE}{dp} = \frac{d}{dp}\!\left(\frac{p^2}{2m}\right) = \frac{p}{m} = v_\text{particle}. \]

The group velocity of the quantum wave packet equals the classical particle velocity. The phase velocity has no direct physical meaning.

5. Wave Function and Probability Born interpretation

A quantum particle is described by a complex-valued wave function \(\Psi(x,t)\). What is its physical meaning?

Born rule

Born (1926)
\[ P(x,t)\,dx = |\Psi(x,t)|^2\,dx \] is the probability of finding the particle between \(x\) and \(x+dx\) at time \(t\).

Since the particle must be somewhere, the total probability must equal one:

Normalisation condition
\[ \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |\Psi(x,t)|^2\,dx = 1. \]
Why complex? A real positive function cannot exhibit interference (you cannot have \(f(x) + g(x) = 0\) if both are positive). Interference is essential for quantum mechanics — it is what produces diffraction. The complex nature of \(\Psi\) allows the probability amplitude to cancel or reinforce.

Probability current

Define the probability current \(j(x,t)\) via the continuity equation:

Derivation of probability current

Differentiating \(\rho = |\Psi|^2 = \Psi^*\Psi\) with respect to time and using the Schrödinger equation (derived in §6):

\[ \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial t}\Psi + \Psi^*\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}. \] From the TDSE: \(i\hbar\,\partial\Psi/\partial t = -(\hbar^2/2m)\,\partial^2\Psi/\partial x^2 + V\Psi\), so \(\partial\Psi/\partial t = \frac{i\hbar}{2m}\partial^2\Psi/\partial x^2 - \frac{i}{\hbar}V\Psi\) (and conjugate for \(\Psi^*\)). Substituting: \[ \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} = \frac{i\hbar}{2m}\!\left( \Psi^*\frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2} - \Psi\frac{\partial^2\Psi^*}{\partial x^2} \right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\!\left[ \frac{i\hbar}{2m}\!\left( \Psi^*\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x} - \Psi\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x} \right) \right]. \] (The \(V\) terms cancel because \(V\) is real.) This is the continuity equation \(\partial\rho/\partial t + \partial j/\partial x = 0\), with:
Probability current
\[ j(x,t) = -\frac{i\hbar}{2m} \!\left(\Psi^*\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x} - \Psi\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x}\right) = \frac{\hbar}{m}\,\operatorname{Im}\!\left(\Psi^*\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x}\right). \]
Normalisation is preserved in time. The continuity equation guarantees \(\frac{d}{dt}\int|\Psi|^2\,dx = 0\), so if \(\Psi\) is normalised at \(t=0\), it stays normalised for all time — provided \(\Psi\to 0\) fast enough as \(|x|\to\infty\).

6. The Schrödinger Equation the central equation of QM

Motivation from plane waves

The simplest quantum state is a free particle moving with definite momentum \(p\) and energy \(E = p^2/(2m)\). By de Broglie, it should behave as a plane wave:

Free-particle plane wave
\[ \Psi(x,t) = A\,e^{i(kx - \omega t)}, \quad k = \frac{p}{\hbar}, \quad \omega = \frac{E}{\hbar}. \]
Reading off operators from the plane wave

Time derivative:

\[ \frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t} = -i\omega\,\Psi \implies i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t} = \hbar\omega\,\Psi = E\,\Psi. \] So the operation \(i\hbar\,\partial/\partial t\) acting on \(\Psi\) gives the energy \(E\) times \(\Psi\).

First spatial derivative:

\[ \frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x} = ik\,\Psi \implies -i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x} = \hbar k\,\Psi = p\,\Psi. \] So \(-i\hbar\,\partial/\partial x\) acting on \(\Psi\) returns the momentum \(p\).

Second spatial derivative:

\[ \frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2} = -k^2\Psi \implies -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2} = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}\Psi = \frac{p^2}{2m}\Psi = K\,\Psi, \] where \(K = p^2/(2m)\) is the kinetic energy.

The classical energy conservation law is \(E = K + V = p^2/(2m) + V\). Replacing each side by its operator action on \(\Psi\):

Time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE)
\[ i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2} + V(x,t)\,\Psi = \hat{H}\,\Psi. \]
Status of this "derivation". The argument above is a plausibility argument, not a rigorous derivation. The Schrödinger equation is a postulate of quantum mechanics — justified by its agreement with experiment in every case tested for a century.

Separation of variables — Time-independent Schrödinger equation

When \(V = V(x)\) (no explicit time dependence), we look for solutions of the form \(\Psi(x,t) = \psi(x)\,\phi(t)\):

Separation of variables

Substitute into TDSE and divide both sides by \(\psi\phi\):

\[ i\hbar\frac{\phi'(t)}{\phi(t)} = \frac{1}{\psi(x)}\!\left[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\psi''(x) + V(x)\psi(x)\right]. \]

The left side depends only on \(t\); the right side depends only on \(x\). Both must equal the same constant — call it \(E\):

\[ i\hbar\phi' = E\phi \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \phi(t) = e^{-iEt/\hbar}. \] \[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\psi'' + V\psi = E\psi. \]
Time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE)
\[ \hat{H}\,\psi(x) = \left[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2} + V(x)\right]\psi(x) = E\,\psi(x). \]

This is an eigenvalue equation: \(\psi\) is an eigenfunction of \(\hat H\) with eigenvalue \(E\). The time-dependence is always the simple phase factor \(e^{-iEt/\hbar}\).

Stationary states. For a separable solution, \(|\Psi|^2 = |\psi|^2|e^{-iEt/\hbar}|^2 = |\psi|^2\) — the probability density is time-independent. These are called stationary states. General solutions are superpositions of stationary states: \[ \Psi(x,t) = \sum_n c_n\,\psi_n(x)\,e^{-iE_nt/\hbar}, \quad \text{with } \sum_n|c_n|^2 = 1. \]

7. Operators and Observables the mathematical framework

In quantum mechanics, every physical observable is represented by a linear operator acting on the wave function. The measurement postulate states that the only possible outcomes of a measurement are the eigenvalues of the corresponding operator.

Fundamental operators

Position operator
\[\hat{x}\,\psi = x\,\psi.\] (Multiplication by \(x\).)
Momentum operator
\[\hat{p} = -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}.\]
Why this form for \(\hat{p}\)?

For a plane wave \(\psi = e^{ipx/\hbar}\) (a state of definite momentum \(p\)):

\[ -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}e^{ipx/\hbar} = -i\hbar \cdot \frac{ip}{\hbar}\,e^{ipx/\hbar} = p\,e^{ipx/\hbar}. \]

So \(\hat{p}\,\psi = p\,\psi\): the operator returns the momentum as its eigenvalue. ✓

Hamiltonian (total energy operator)
\[ \hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + V(\hat{x}) = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + V(x). \]

Expectation values

The expectation value of an observable \(Q\) in state \(\Psi\) is the average result over many identical measurements:

Expectation value
\[ \langle \hat{Q} \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^*(x,t)\,\hat{Q}\,\Psi(x,t)\,dx. \]
Hermitian operators. For a measurement result to be real, we need \(\langle\hat{Q}\rangle\in\mathbb{R}\) for all \(\Psi\). This requires \(\hat{Q}\) to be Hermitian: \(\hat{Q}^\dagger = \hat{Q}\), i.e. \(\int\Psi^*(\hat{Q}\Phi)\,dx = \int(\hat{Q}\Psi)^*\Phi\,dx\) for all admissible \(\Psi,\Phi\). Both \(\hat{x}\) and \(\hat{p}\) are Hermitian.

The canonical commutator

Explicit computation of \([\hat{x},\hat{p}]\)

The commutator \([\hat{x},\hat{p}] = \hat{x}\hat{p} - \hat{p}\hat{x}\). Let it act on an arbitrary function \(\psi(x)\):

\[ [\hat{x},\hat{p}]\,\psi = x\!\left(-i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\right) - \left(-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)(x\,\psi). \] Using the product rule on the second term: \[ = -i\hbar x\psi' + i\hbar(\psi + x\psi') = i\hbar\,\psi. \] Since this holds for all \(\psi\):
Canonical commutation relation
\[ [\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar. \]
Why commutators matter. Two observables can be simultaneously measured with arbitrary precision if and only if their operators commute (\([\hat A,\hat B]=0\)). The non-zero commutator \([\hat x,\hat p]=i\hbar\) is precisely what forbids knowing position and momentum simultaneously — the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

8. Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle derived from commutators

Standard deviation of an observable

For observable \(\hat{A}\), define \(\sigma_A^2 = \langle\hat{A}^2\rangle - \langle\hat{A}\rangle^2\). The generalised uncertainty principle states:

Generalised uncertainty principle
\[ \sigma_A\,\sigma_B \ge \frac{1}{2}\bigl|\langle[\hat{A},\hat{B}]\rangle\bigr|. \]
Derivation sketch via Cauchy–Schwarz

Define shifted operators \(\hat{f} = \hat{A} - \langle A\rangle\), \(\hat{g} = \hat{B} - \langle B\rangle\). Note \(\sigma_A^2 = \langle\hat{f}^2\rangle = \langle f|f\rangle\) and similarly for \(B\).

Cauchy–Schwarz inequality: For any two vectors \(|f\rangle, |g\rangle\) in a Hilbert space: \(\langle f|f\rangle\langle g|g\rangle \ge |\langle f|g\rangle|^2\). So:

\[ \sigma_A^2\sigma_B^2 \ge |\langle f|g\rangle|^2. \]

Write \(\langle f|g\rangle = \frac{1}{2}\langle[\hat f,\hat g]\rangle + \frac{1}{2}\langle\{\hat f,\hat g\}\rangle\), where the commutator part is purely imaginary and the anti-commutator part is real. Taking the modulus:

\[ |\langle f|g\rangle|^2 \ge \left|\frac{1}{2}\langle[\hat f,\hat g]\rangle\right|^2 = \left|\frac{1}{2}\langle[\hat A,\hat B]\rangle\right|^2. \] Taking the square root gives the result.

Position–momentum uncertainty

Applying to \(\hat{A}=\hat{x}\), \(\hat{B}=\hat{p}\) with \([\hat{x},\hat{p}]=i\hbar\):

Heisenberg uncertainty principle
\[ \sigma_x\,\sigma_p \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}. \]
Physical meaning. \(\sigma_x\) is the spread of position measurements and \(\sigma_p\) is the spread of momentum measurements, both taken on identically prepared states. This is not a statement about measurement disturbance — it is a fundamental property of the quantum state itself. A state with perfectly definite position (\(\sigma_x=0\)) would require \(\sigma_p=\infty\), meaning the momentum is completely uncertain.

Energy–time uncertainty

Energy–time uncertainty
\[ \sigma_E\,\Delta t \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}, \] where \(\Delta t\) is the characteristic time for the expectation value of some observable to change appreciably. This is not derived from a commutator (time is a parameter, not an operator in NRQM), but follows from Fourier analysis of wave packets.

Minimum-uncertainty state

Equality holds in the uncertainty principle when \(\hat g|\psi\rangle = ic\,\hat f|\psi\rangle\) for some real \(c\). For \(\hat x\) and \(\hat p\) this gives:

\[ \left(-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx} - \langle p\rangle\right)\psi = ic\bigl(x - \langle x\rangle\bigr)\psi. \] Solving: \(\psi(x) \propto \exp\!\left[-\frac{(x-\langle x\rangle)^2}{4\sigma_x^2} + \frac{i\langle p\rangle x}{\hbar}\right]\) — a Gaussian wave packet is the minimum-uncertainty state.

9. Infinite Square Well first exact solution

The simplest bound-state problem: a particle confined to a box of length \(L\), free inside and forbidden from escaping.

Potential
\[ V(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & 0 < x < L, \\ +\infty & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \]

Boundary conditions

The wave function must be continuous everywhere. Since \(V=+\infty\) outside the well, we must have \(\psi(x)=0\) for \(x\le 0\) and \(x\ge L\). Continuity then requires:

\[ \psi(0) = 0, \qquad \psi(L) = 0. \]
Solving the TISE inside the well

Inside (\(0 < x < L\)), \(V=0\), so the TISE is:

\[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\psi'' = E\psi \implies \psi'' = -k^2\psi, \quad k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar} \quad (E > 0). \]

General solution:

\[ \psi(x) = A\sin(kx) + B\cos(kx). \]

Apply BC at \(x=0\): \(\psi(0) = B = 0\), so \(B=0\).

Apply BC at \(x=L\): \(\psi(L) = A\sin(kL) = 0\).

Since \(A\ne 0\) (otherwise \(\psi=0\) everywhere — not normalisable), we need:

\[ \sin(kL) = 0 \implies kL = n\pi,\ n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \implies k_n = \frac{n\pi}{L}. \] (\(n=0\) is excluded since it gives \(\psi\equiv 0\). Negative \(n\) give the same states.)
Energy quantisation
\[ E_n = \frac{\hbar^2 k_n^2}{2m} = \frac{n^2\pi^2\hbar^2}{2mL^2} = n^2 E_1, \qquad E_1 = \frac{\pi^2\hbar^2}{2mL^2}. \]

The energy is quantised — only discrete values are allowed. \(E_1 > 0\) is the zero-point energy: the particle cannot be at rest inside the well, consistent with the uncertainty principle.

Normalisation

Finding the constant A
\[ 1 = \int_0^L |A\sin(k_n x)|^2\,dx = A^2\int_0^L \sin^2\!\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)dx = A^2 \cdot \frac{L}{2}. \] \[ \therefore \quad A = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}. \]
Normalised energy eigenfunctions
\[ \psi_n(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\sin\!\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right), \quad E_n = \frac{n^2\pi^2\hbar^2}{2mL^2}, \quad n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \]

Orthonormality

Proof that eigenstates are orthonormal
\[ \int_0^L \psi_m^*(x)\,\psi_n(x)\,dx = \frac{2}{L}\int_0^L \sin\!\left(\frac{m\pi x}{L}\right)\sin\!\left(\frac{n\pi x}{L}\right)dx. \] Using the identity \(2\sin A\sin B = \cos(A-B) - \cos(A+B)\): \[ = \frac{1}{L}\int_0^L\!\left[\cos\!\left(\frac{(m-n)\pi x}{L}\right) - \cos\!\left(\frac{(m+n)\pi x}{L}\right)\right]dx. \] Both terms integrate to zero unless \(m=n\), in which case the first term gives 1 and the second gives 0: \[ \int_0^L \psi_m^*\psi_n\,dx = \delta_{mn}. \]

General state

An arbitrary initial wave function in the well can be expanded as:

Completeness expansion
\[ \Psi(x,0) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n\,\psi_n(x), \qquad c_n = \int_0^L \psi_n^*(x)\,\Psi(x,0)\,dx, \qquad \sum_{n=1}^\infty|c_n|^2 = 1. \] \[ \Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n\,\psi_n(x)\,e^{-iE_nt/\hbar}. \]
Physical interpretation of \(|c_n|^2\). When the energy is measured, the probability of obtaining result \(E_n\) is \(|c_n|^2\). After the measurement, the wave function collapses to \(\psi_n\). The expectation value of energy is \(\langle E\rangle = \sum_n|c_n|^2 E_n\).

10. Quantum Harmonic Oscillator ladder operators

The harmonic oscillator — a particle in a parabolic potential \(V = \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2\) — is arguably the most important exactly-solvable problem in all of physics. It models vibrations of molecules, phonons in solids, photons in a cavity, and more.

TISE for the harmonic oscillator
\[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\psi'' + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2\,\psi = E\,\psi. \]

Ladder (creation and annihilation) operators

Define two operators:

Ladder operators
\[ \hat{a}_\pm = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}\!\left(\mp i\hat{p} + m\omega\hat{x}\right) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}\!\left(\pm\hbar\frac{d}{dx} + m\omega x\right). \] \(\hat{a}_+\) is the raising (creation) operator; \(\hat{a}_-\) is the lowering (annihilation) operator.
Rewriting \(\hat{H}\) in terms of ladder operators

Compute \(\hat{a}_-\hat{a}_+\):

\[ \hat{a}_-\hat{a}_+ = \frac{1}{2m\hbar\omega}(i\hat{p} + m\omega\hat{x})(-i\hat{p} + m\omega\hat{x}) = \frac{1}{2m\hbar\omega}\!\left(\hat{p}^2 + m^2\omega^2\hat{x}^2 + im\omega[\hat{x},\hat{p}]\right). \] Using \([\hat{x},\hat{p}]=i\hbar\): \[ = \frac{1}{\hbar\omega}\!\left(\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + \frac{m\omega^2\hat{x}^2}{2}\right) - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{\hat{H}}{\hbar\omega} - \frac{1}{2}. \] Similarly, \(\hat{a}_+\hat{a}_- = \hat{H}/(\hbar\omega) + 1/2\). Therefore: \[ \hat{H} = \hbar\omega\!\left(\hat{a}_-\hat{a}_+ - \frac{1}{2}\right) = \hbar\omega\!\left(\hat{a}_+\hat{a}_- + \frac{1}{2}\right) = \hbar\omega\!\left(\hat{N} + \frac{1}{2}\right), \] where \(\hat{N} = \hat{a}_+\hat{a}_-\) is the number operator. The commutator of the ladder operators: \[ [\hat{a}_-,\hat{a}_+] = 1. \]
Why \(\hat{a}_\pm\) raise/lower the energy

If \(\hat{H}\psi = E\psi\), consider \(\hat{a}_+\psi\):

\[ \hat{H}(\hat{a}_+\psi) = \hbar\omega\!\left(\hat{a}_+\hat{a}_- + \tfrac{1}{2}\right)\hat{a}_+\psi = \hbar\omega\,\hat{a}_+\!\left(\hat{a}_-\hat{a}_+ + \tfrac{1}{2}\right)\psi + \hbar\omega\,\hat{a}_+[\hat{a}_-,\hat{a}_+]\psi. \] Wait — let's use the simpler route: use \([\hat H, \hat a_+] = \hbar\omega\,\hat a_+\) (provable from ladder algebra): \[ \hat{H}(\hat{a}_+\psi) = ([\hat{H},\hat{a}_+] + \hat{a}_+\hat{H})\psi = \hbar\omega\,\hat{a}_+\psi + \hat{a}_+(E\psi) = (E + \hbar\omega)\,(\hat{a}_+\psi). \] So \(\hat{a}_+\psi\) is an eigenstate of \(\hat{H}\) with energy \(E + \hbar\omega\). ✓ Similarly, \(\hat{a}_-\psi\) has energy \(E - \hbar\omega\).

Energy spectrum

Lowering cannot go on forever — the energy is bounded below by \(V_\text{min}=0\). There must be a ground state \(\psi_0\) annihilated by \(\hat{a}_-\):

Ground state from \(\hat{a}_-\psi_0 = 0\)
\[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}\!\left(\hbar\frac{d}{dx} + m\omega x\right)\psi_0 = 0 \implies \frac{d\psi_0}{dx} = -\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}\,x\,\psi_0. \] This is a first-order linear ODE. Separating variables: \[ \ln\psi_0 = -\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}x^2 + \text{const} \implies \psi_0(x) = A\,e^{-m\omega x^2/(2\hbar)}. \] Normalising (\(\int e^{-m\omega x^2/\hbar}dx = \sqrt{\pi\hbar/m\omega}\)): \[ \psi_0(x) = \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4} e^{-m\omega x^2/(2\hbar)}. \] The ground state energy: \(\hat{H}\psi_0 = \hbar\omega(\hat{N}+\tfrac{1}{2})\psi_0 = \tfrac{1}{2}\hbar\omega\,\psi_0\).
Complete energy spectrum
\[ E_n = \left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)\hbar\omega, \qquad n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots \] \[ \psi_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}\,(\hat{a}_+)^n\,\psi_0. \]
Zero-point energy. The ground state energy \(E_0 = \tfrac{1}{2}\hbar\omega \ne 0\). Even at absolute zero temperature, a quantum oscillator always vibrates. This is a direct consequence of the uncertainty principle: a perfectly motionless particle at \(x=0\) would have \(\sigma_x = \sigma_p = 0\), violating \(\sigma_x\sigma_p\ge\hbar/2\).

Matrix elements (ladder operator action)

Explicit ladder action on energy eigenstates
\[ \hat{a}_+|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}\,|n+1\rangle, \qquad \hat{a}_-|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}\,|n-1\rangle, \qquad \hat{N}|n\rangle = n|n\rangle. \] \[ \hat{x} = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\,(\hat{a}_+ + \hat{a}_-), \qquad \hat{p} = i\sqrt{\frac{m\hbar\omega}{2}}\,(\hat{a}_+ - \hat{a}_-). \]

11. Quantum Tunnelling classically forbidden motion

A classical particle with energy \(E < V_0\) approaching a potential barrier of height \(V_0\) is always reflected. In quantum mechanics, the wave function penetrates the barrier and there is a non-zero probability of the particle emerging on the other side — tunnelling.

Rectangular barrier setup

Potential
\[ V(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & x < 0, \\ V_0 & 0 \le x \le a, \\ 0 & x > a. \end{cases} \qquad 0 < E < V_0. \]

Wave function in each region

Three-region analysis

Region I (\(x < 0\)): \(V=0\), so \(\psi'' = -k^2\psi\) with \(k=\sqrt{2mE}/\hbar\). Incident wave (rightward) plus reflected wave (leftward):

\[ \psi_\text{I}(x) = A\,e^{ikx} + B\,e^{-ikx}. \]

Region II (\(0 \le x \le a\)): \(V=V_0 > E\), so \(\psi'' = +\kappa^2\psi\) with \(\kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar > 0\). Real exponentials:

\[ \psi_\text{II}(x) = C\,e^{\kappa x} + D\,e^{-\kappa x}. \]

Region III (\(x > a\)): \(V=0\) again. Only rightward-travelling wave (no source of a leftward wave on the right):

\[ \psi_\text{III}(x) = F\,e^{ikx}. \]

Matching conditions

Continuity of \(\psi\) and \(\psi'\) at \(x=0\) and \(x=a\)

At \(x=0\): \(\psi_\text{I}=\psi_\text{II}\) and \(\psi_\text{I}'=\psi_\text{II}'\):

\[ A + B = C + D, \tag{i} \] \[ ik(A - B) = \kappa(C - D). \tag{ii} \]

At \(x=a\): \(\psi_\text{II}=\psi_\text{III}\) and \(\psi_\text{II}'=\psi_\text{III}'\):

\[ Ce^{\kappa a} + De^{-\kappa a} = Fe^{ika}, \tag{iii} \] \[ \kappa(Ce^{\kappa a} - De^{-\kappa a}) = ikFe^{ika}. \tag{iv} \]

Set \(A=1\) (unit incident amplitude). The four equations determine \(B,C,D,F\). The algebra is lengthy; the result for the transmission amplitude is:

\[ F = \frac{e^{-ika}}{\cosh(\kappa a) + \frac{i}{2}\!\left(\frac{\kappa}{k}-\frac{k}{\kappa}\right)\!\sinh(\kappa a)}. \]

Transmission coefficient

Exact transmission coefficient
\[ T = |F|^2 = \left[1 + \frac{(k^2+\kappa^2)^2}{4k^2\kappa^2}\sinh^2(\kappa a)\right]^{-1}. \]
Thick-barrier approximation (\(\kappa a \gg 1\))

When \(\kappa a \gg 1\), \(\sinh(\kappa a) \approx \frac{1}{2}e^{\kappa a}\), so:

\[ T \approx \frac{16k^2\kappa^2}{(k^2+\kappa^2)^2}\,e^{-2\kappa a} = 16\,\frac{E}{V_0}\!\left(1-\frac{E}{V_0}\right) e^{-2\kappa a}. \]

The dominant factor is the exponential decay \(e^{-2\kappa a}\), where \(\kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar\). The prefactor is slowly varying and \(\sim 1\).

WKB generalisation. For a smoothly varying barrier \(V(x)\), the Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin approximation gives: \[ T \approx \exp\!\left(-\frac{2}{\hbar}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\sqrt{2m(V(x)-E)}\,dx\right), \] where \(x_1, x_2\) are the classical turning points where \(V(x)=E\).

Physical examples of tunnelling

Alpha decay. An alpha particle tunnels through the Coulomb barrier of the nucleus. The exponential sensitivity of \(T\) to \(\kappa a\) explains the enormous range of nuclear lifetimes (from nanoseconds to billions of years).
Scanning tunnelling microscope (STM). A metallic tip is held nanometres above a surface. Electrons tunnel across the vacuum gap; the exponential dependence on gap width gives atomic-scale height resolution.
Tunnel diodes and Josephson junctions. Semiconductor tunnel diodes exploit band-to-band tunnelling. Josephson junctions (two superconductors separated by a thin insulator) are the building blocks of superconducting qubits.

Summary — Key Equations at a Glance

Concept Formula What it says
Planck quantisation \(E_n = nh\nu\) Oscillator energy is discrete
Photon energy \(E = h\nu = \hbar\omega\) Light comes in quanta
Photon momentum \(p = h/\lambda = \hbar k\) Photon carries momentum
Photoelectric effect \(K_\text{max} = h\nu - \phi\) Energy conservation with photon
Compton shift \(\Delta\lambda = \lambda_C(1-\cos\theta)\) Photon–electron elastic collision
de Broglie wavelength \(\lambda = h/p\) Particles have wave character
Born rule \(P(x,t)dx = |\Psi|^2\,dx\) Probability from amplitude squared
TDSE \(i\hbar\,\partial_t\Psi = \hat{H}\Psi\) Quantum equation of motion
TISE \(\hat{H}\psi = E\psi\) Energy eigenvalue equation
Momentum operator \(\hat{p} = -i\hbar\,\partial_x\) Momentum as differential operator
Canonical commutator \([\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar\) Foundation of uncertainty
Heisenberg uncertainty \(\sigma_x\sigma_p \ge \hbar/2\) Fundamental limit on precision
Infinite well energies \(E_n = n^2\pi^2\hbar^2/(2mL^2)\) Quantised levels in a box
Harmonic oscillator energies \(E_n = (n+\tfrac{1}{2})\hbar\omega\) Equally spaced spectrum
Tunnelling (thick barrier) \(T \approx e^{-2\kappa a}\) Exponential barrier penetration